The History of Kurdistan and Kurdish people in Syria:
by: Moraru, Burian, Spataru and Miro
efrin.net 05.04.06
Kurdistan is unquestionably on the richest countries in the world in
terms of vestiges of the past.This land, pregnant with history and
civilization, a pivotal point between the East and the West, a link
between tow continents, a communication route and the cradle of the
oldest civilzation, has always intrigued archaeologists and scholars.
And as welknown Prof.Yoteshilani discovered that Mitanians Kurds had
lived near of Khabour and their Kingdom named Shenak (under King
Mitani).
But the other archaeologists confirmed ,that Kurds(Hurians and
Mitanians) reunited their Kingdom :under Kingdom Hurian-Mitanian and the
Centre entitled Ashe-Kani in near of Khabour (tel Al-Feghriya, Sixteenth
Millenary).
The Royal Palace of Orkish,(related to King Orkish and Newar)about
2500-2300 b.c discovered in 1955 by Prof.Georgi Yoteshilani, University
of California), is undoubtedly the most noteworthy in the near East ,a
jewel of archaic oriental architecture.It is 200 meters long and 120
meters wide, and have about 300 rooms, corridors and courtyards. Its
construction was an undertaking for which several generations of Kings
and princes were responsible.The palace was the centre of the official
life of a vast Kingdom; an administrative headquarters where hundeds of
functionaries worked and where the king held audience.
One wing contained the private apartments of royal family,another was
set aside for government staff,another houses schools,and yet another
armouries.The palace was protected by thick walls. The presence of
ceramic bathtubs testifies to the luxurious style of living in the royal
residence-not to mention the mural paintings in some of the rooms,
notable for their colours, the variety of their subject matter, and the
beauty of their composition.No ancient palace was as large as Mari, nor
so well organized and so skilfully decorated .Orkish and Gere-Muza
privilrgrd between the Mediterranean on the one hand and Mesopotamia and
Anatolia on the other hand. It was very important coomercial centre ,
and understandably it was coveted by other kingdoms, who tried in vain
to gaincontrol of caravan trade routes linking different countries of
the ancient world.The Amorite people also Mitanians,Hurians and Later
Medians who inhabited the kingdom of Orkish,Gere -Muza and also later
Shenak managed to preserve their independence for a long time and to
take their township the uncontested capital of the region of the Middle
Euphrates ,Constantly fortifying it and extending its territory.They
produce of the fertile soil of this area.All these factors helped to
create on ethe most flourishing and brilliant civilzations of third and
second millenia BC.As wll known, the British archaeological Commission
by leadership of Mr.Maksoul Mawlawan( the book Ibala-page 31) and had
discovered(in western Kurdsiatn) the following ancient
ruins:Tel-Shaghour Bazar: it was confirmed ,that the town Tel-Shaghour
was created by Mitanians and their King and also the German
archaeological Commission between 1955-1956 had discovered and achieved
the flourishing Truth: They found the town Tel-Fahriya, located in
northern of Khabour, it was dating to Twelfth Millenary) and its centre
(capital city)
entitled "Washokany" So it was that during the second millennium
Mesopotamia (especially Kurdistan)and Syria became a politically and
culturally active centre, and the stake in large-scale international
conflicts.Gere-Muza,Tel -Fahria and Telshaher Bazr,TelBarak, Mirga,Hemo
ker,(= found by France Archaeologists)Babylon, Aleppo, Ugarit and Mari
were at th ehub of events during this period.But the invasion of the
"people from the sea" about the year 1200bc reduced most of
Mesopotamia´s Kurdistan and Syria´s towns to ruins and ashes.
(We are still thinking that the villages of Ger zerin,near the town
Derek-Almalekia and the Area ,which located between Village of Gere vera
and Gerke selma have a secret ancient ruins of the Hurians; Metanians
and Medians). It is all this period that archaeologists date the world´s
earliest alphabet, discovered at Ugarit (Ras -Al-Shamra) on the Syrian
coast.
It is a cuneiform alphabet comprising 30 signs, and was later adopted by
the Greeks and Romans.
The Mitaneans(Kurds)and later Aramians came to inside Syria in the first
millenniums and established several kingdoms there, the most powerful of
them being Damascus(by Arameans).
At that time Mesopotamia and Syria had to cope with several invasions by
the New-Assyrians, The Neo-Babylonians(Keldo=Celdan)and the Persian.
When Alexander the Great, King of Macedonia,had destroyed the Persian
(332-333 bc) and the rest Independence of Median
(Kurds)Kurdistan(Mesopotamia,Babylon)fell into his hands.(see the
Alexander the Great,page 341--354 ,357-358-359-360-361,362-363 by Robin
Lane Fox), (see mtv.Aktuell ;Licht im Tal des Königes,Page 42 by
Kunstman,Athen).
The only resistance he encountered was at Tyre, which he took by storm
and whose defenders he executed. After his premature death in Babylon in
323 B.C, his general quarrelled over his inheritance.At the beginning of
the reign of Seleucus I, Syria comprised an extensive territory
stretching from the Median Territory (Deshta zer) on one side to the
black Sea and the Bosphorus on the other.As such, Kurdistan played an
important civilising role, namely the implantation of Greek culture in
Asia.On the other hand, I would like to refer that the Antioch, which
almost from the outset was the capital of this kingdom, rapidly became ,
like Alexendria,a flourishing centre of Hellenics, a luxury city, where
people from all parts of the ancient world flocked to seek pleasure.The
towns in the interior, Damascus and Palmyra,were similarly
transformed.The most illustrious of the Seleucide I (312-280), who
organised the kingdom and created numerous towns:
Apamia, Antioch, Seleucia, Laodicia, Cyrrhus.His successors, who were
named Seleucus, Demetrius,Poliorcete,could not prevent the break-away
resulting from provincial uprising or foreign attacks which continually
reduced the area of their States.At the end of the second century, they
possessed scarcely more than Syria proper, and this was finally shared
between two Seleucids.When the Roman arrived, they occupied the country
without difficulty.Conquered in 64 by Pompey, Syria and later western
Kurdistan and the rest Kurdistan became a Roman province.
Like the rest of the Empire, the country enjoyed peace for many
years.Agriculture and trade were revived.The Parthians crossed the
frontiers in the East from time to time, but they were regularly,
repulsed, and the Emperors Trajan and Septum´s Severus won victories
over them.Local dynasties subsisted for quite a long time in Damascus
and Palmyra,Mount Lebanon and Homs;but one after another they died out
.At the end of third century , the Empire,Diolcetian divided Syria into
6 provinces (including western
Kurdistan) all of them under the sway of Rome.
But soon the foundation of the second Sassanide Empire on the ruins the
Parthians Empire was to cause trouble for Syria and
Mesopotamia=Kurdistan .Odeinat,King of Palmyra,husband of the
Illustrious Zenobia,forced the Kurds to cross the Euphrates, but failed
to stop them.The Emperors Aurelian and Diocletian were once again
obliged to repulse their invasions.The situation did not improve after
396, when the Roman Empire crumbled, or rather spilt into new Empires,
one of which the Westrn Empire -was to be ephemeral, and the other the
Eastern Empire-more durable (395-1453).Also Syria,Mesopotamia =Kurdistan
and especially westrn Kurdistan naturally formed part of the latter, but
was not so well administreted from Byzantium as form Rome.
Except for Justinian in the 6th century and Heracliuc in the 7th
century, the Byzantine Emperors were weaker and less combative, and have
not to forget that the earliest vidence thus far of a unified and
distinct shared by the people of the"Halaf Cultuer"which emerged about
8000 years ago.Named for the ancient moud of Tel Halaf in what is now
Syrian Kurdistan (west of the town Qamishlo), this culture is best known
for its easily recognizeable style of pottery which , fortunately, was
produced in abundance.Exquisitely painted, delicately,designed Halaf
potterry is easily distinguishable from earlier and later productios.
Judging from pottery.In fact,taking Halaf pottery as a prime
example,many arcaeologists now point out that shared pottery style is a
simple but crucial tool in helping to classify prehistoric cultures in
the Middle East.Yet, while shared pottery can imply shared culture,it
can no more imply shared ethnicity than identical rug design today.For
example, the Turkic Qahqai,luric Mamasani and Arab Basrei tribes of the
southern Zagros Mountains all share similar
rug.Ethno-Linguistically,however, these three peoples share virtually
nothing else.
This fact serves as aclear warning to those who would use shared
artistic styles as an indication of shared ethnicity.More prudently,
pottery must be taken in tandem with other evidence in order to make a
case for shared culture and ethnicity. Wide-spread Halafian excavation
sites have much more in common than styles of pottery.
Solid evidence has now emerged indicating striking similarities in food,
technology,architecture,ritual and ornaments,all of which suggest
something more substantive. Archaelogist Julian Reade,now a curator at
the British Museum´s Department of Western Asiatic Antiquities has this
to say" While we really know little about how the inhabitants of ahalaf
village thought ,let a lone what languages they used for thinking, and
implicit values and that even that even those who did not travel may met
from time to time in religious or administrative centres"(Reade
1991).With the aid of these archaeological criteria, Reade as well as
Michael Roaf (archaeologist and former director now at the University of
California, Berkeley) have determined the boundaries of Halaf Culture.
The coincide almost exactly with the area ethnic Kurds still call home:
from Kirmanshah to Adyaman, and from Efrin near the Mediterranean Sea to
northern areas of Lake van.The distribution of Halaf pottery and the
distribution of ethnic Kurds today are a near -perfect match.The single
exception is the Mosul-Tikrit region of the Mesopotamia lowlands which
also yields Halaf pottery.
James Melaart, better known for his exception of Catal Huyuk, found many
of the motifs and composite designs present on Halaf pottery and
figurines still exact in the textile and decorative designs of the
modern Kurds who now inhabit the same excavated Halafian siotes. It is
highly unlikely that the Halafian people constituted an immigrant
population.According to several demographic studies (e.g.P.Smith and
T.Cuyler Young 1982) the Zagros mountains were the site of perennial
population surplus and pressure from 12000 to 5000 years ago, which must
have resulted in mumerous episodes of emigration.
Halafian figures of dogs (ca.6000BC) with up curled tails unlike that of
any specie of wolf were unearthed in Jarmo in central Kurdistan.
The cultural period ends with the arrival, circa 5300BC.Of a new
culture, and quite likely a new people: the Ubaidians."Ubaid
Culture"expanded from the plains of Mezopotamia into the mountains.
Ubaidians, or proto Euphratians, as they are sometime called, caused a
hybrid culture to emerge in the mountains, comprised of their own
cultural heritage and that of the earlier Halaf.It predominated in not
most of Kurdistan and Mezopotamia,as well as the names of almost all of
the cities we now recognize as Sumerian.
The Hurrians a spoken language or languages of the western-eastren group
of the European-Indian -Caucasian family of Languages, distantly related
to modern lezgian and by extension to Georgian and Laz. But the
Mitaneans and Medians spoken Language related togather to
Indo-European-Germanic.The direction of their expansion is not yet
understood and by no means should be taken as having been north-south,
in other worde, as an expansion out of the Caucususes.(it may well be
not exactly that it was the Hurrians who introduced Caucasian but
European´s but he nearst fact that the Hurrians was introduced as
European´s tribes....)And the German (the modern Germans) were mixed in
1949 b.c with Kurdish people and Mezopotamia.
The avalanche of Indo-European-Germanic tribes, however,was to come
about 1200 raining havoc on the economy and settled culture in the
mountains and lowlands alike.
The north was settled by the Haiks, known to us as the Armenian,while
the rest of the mountains became targets of settlement for various
Iranic peoples,such as the Medes,Persians,Scythians,Sar-mathians and
Sagarthians(whose name survives in the name of the Zagros Mountains).
By 850 BC, the last Hurrian states had been extinguished by the invading
Aryans, whose sheer numbers of immigrants must have been
considerable.The succeeded over time in changing the Hurrian languages
of the people in Kurdistan,as well as their genetic make-up.By the 3rd
century BC, the Aryanzation of the mountain was virtually complete.
In the Brisitun inscription Darius I also makes note of this battle
tactic used by the Kurdish mounatin against his forces.He called the
guerrillas the kara( a cognate of guerrila).800 years
later,king,Ardashir, founder of the Persian Sasanian dynasty,faced the
same defensive spar which has meaning almost identical with the modern
term,peshmerga:while many hypotheses have advanced to connect the ethnic
name "Kurd"to that of the ancient Hurrian Qutils or the
Khardukhoi(Cawkel,1979), none have much merit.Whatever the roots, there
is evidence to push the origin of the word "Kurd" back at least to the
early 4th millennium BC, if not earlier.- I would like to come back into
the Kurdish History A.C. to confirm that in the Middle Ages Kurdistan
was composed of a large number of Independent Kurdish principalities of
a feudal structure, as were the majority of European nations at that
tiem.The father of Kurdish historicans, Prince Cheref Khan of
Bitlis,wrote in 1596 the first work, in tow volumes on Kurdish
history,entitled Cheref Namah, or annals of the Kurdish Nation
(published for the first time in Str.Petersburg, 1860 in the original
version,by Zernof,then translated and published in French ,also in 1875
with notes).Another basic text for the study of ancient Kurdistan is
entitled Evliya Tchelebi Syahet namesi,written by Turkish traveller
geographer of the 17th century,Evliya Tchelebi,published in
Constantinople insix volumes.
As welknown the Treaty of Severs (it is the first time that the rights
of the Kurdish people to autonomy and independence were recognized
internationally), was never applied ,nor even ratified.The coming power
of Mustefa Kamal left everything in doubt.
On the other hand the arrival of the France troops occupied Syria and
Western Kurdistan and British troops occupied Iraq in 1917 and especialy
southern Kurdistan in 1918.
In that half of the 20th century , when colonized and oppressed peoples
are acceding to complete national independence ,the desire of the
Kurdish people in Syria to exercise their inalienable right to
self-determination following a policy of coexistence with the Arabs in
the same State, on the basis of autonomy,constitute a very moderate and
reasonable demanded which is in the common interests of both Arabs and
Kurds.
Since Baathists coup d´etat of March 8th as a bloody regime in Syria ,
the all Kurdish natonal rights even cultural rights has been forbidden
and schools banned.
On September 30,1963 a project of Syro-Iraqi Federation was announced in
Damascus :" Apopular ,socialist, and democratic State, including Iraq
and Syria, will be the historic turning point of the Arab struggle for
unity and socialism,"proclaimed an official declaration published in
Damascus.And a military unity has been established on October 8, between
Syria and Iraq against the Kurdish liberation movemnet.
We know that a complete Syrian division of 17,000 men was transferred to
"Iraqi Kurdistan" Because of a blow to prestige; the officers of the
iraqi Army were not satisfied with the presence of Syrian support.
This support proves enough should new proofs be still necessary, that
the Iraqi Army had completely failed in its campaign of the Kurdistan
Revolutionary Army,the Syrian troops had even less success.
Here it is very important to remember , that the France detached western
Kurdistan from the central Kurdistan.And France divided Syria into five
States : the State of Alaouites, the State of Allepo, the State
Damascus, The State of Jebel Druz and the State of Qamishlo.(western
Kurdistan).
The Constitutionn of 1930 endwed the country with republican
institutions, and the Treaty of Paris recognized the Independence of
Syria, Lebanon and Autonomy of western Kurdistan (more over according to
the treaty of Paris the Syrian military is not allowed to cross the
boundary of Homes especialy into western Kurdistan). In 1941, British
and free france troops entered Syria and Lebanon after having chased out
the Vichy French forces.General Charles de Gaulle then proclaimed the
independence of Syria,and Lebanon in 1942, and announced that the French
troops would be withdrawing as soon as the war ended. Sorrow, the French
government has ignored his treaties,promises in 1928,1936,which has
granted the Kurdish peopel the real Autonomy and it was the historical
crime against the Kurdish people in Syria.
The arrival of French reinforcement caused an Uprising in western
Kurdistan and later in Damascus.The reason of Kurdish uprising was that
the French had ignored his Treaty of Paris 1936,which granted to set up
the Autonomy in western Kurdistan.
But the Arab delegation and French administartion made secretly series
of Agreements,and both of them were ignored the Treaty of Paris and
already the treaty of Severs to set up an independence Kurdish Republic.
Arab national Party and Government .who has ignored the Kurdish Entity
absolutly, and his all national and human rights systematicaly between
1963-2003, including "assimilation" of Kurds,
terrorism,prisons,decrimination,masceres ..etc....and such kind of
coloniaL-crizy policy,aggression and tyrany reinforcement Qamishlo´s
Uprising on 12th March 2003 in town Qamishlo against the Baathist-bloody
and barbarist-regime..
Only for the history, in 1949 the Kurds had an important rule in Syria,
the first Presidnet of Syria was Kurdish, I mean Huzni Zaim,who had took
the govenment in his hand .And the official Minister of defence was also
Kurdish Mr.Nizamedin Taufik .As well known the first Minsiter of Defence
of Syria was kurdish ; Mr.Yusef Alazama, who clashed with french troops
in Battle;Maiselun1919.The most Syrian Revolution´s leaders were
Kurds,e.g Ibrahim Hanano, Ahmed Barave and Jemal
Kur...etc..................
2- The national economy of Syria depends basicaly on western
Kurdistan-revenues(Syrian Kurdistan):
The Baath Arab Socialist Party had overthrown the power on 8 March 1963
and announced that it intended to revolutionize the country .A programme
of nationalization and Arabinalization reform (without Kurdish people)
was introduced.
The formation of the Progressive National Front,(also without Kurdish
Co-Operation and Existence) grouping all nationalist and working under
the aegis of the Baath Arab Socialist Party, the Kurdish democratic
organisations and Movements in spite of Albaath ignorance, whose task is
to establish the democratic country in Syria and a permanent
constituation , which was promulgated and supported by Kurdish People in
western Kurdistan in Syria.Of course, the Baath government did not
accept absolutely such kind of Kurdish reality and Existence.There are
tow kinds of the law in Syria:
- The promulgating of the law on local administration, with the setting
up of a whole system of regionalisation guaranteeing democracy and
control by the people themselves (according to Albaath constitution and
Policy).
The preservation of the liberty and dignity of citizens by the adoption
of a number of measure proving that the Government intends to institute
a climate of total confidence and collaboration between State
institutionand the mass of the people.But such kind of law is not
permitted in western Kurdistan or (province Alhasake),.There are the
special Laws and constitutions, which are
comparable to the colonial System.The Military Authorities, national
Intelligence, Military Security and forces have the complete rights to
control the social, economical,cultural, political cases in western
Kurdistan. The fourth Five year Plan covering the years 1976-1980 was
adopted by the Albaath´s Institutions on March 1977 and promulgated on 6
April 1977 nearly a year and a half behind schedule, largely owing to
the political and finanicial problems which arose at that time.
The plan provided for the investment of 54,166 million Syrian pounds
from 1976 to 1980 on the basis of minimum estimate. Anumber of
industrial projects were inaugurated; the necessarily limited space here
available does not make it possible to give details, and we shall
confine ourselves to mentioning the Homs nitrogenous fertiliser factory,
the Hama metal bar works, the fina thread factory also at Hama.
The tractor and agriculture machinery plant at Allepo and many others
plans-not forgetting petroleum, phosphates and rock salt, which Syria
has begun to produce in sufficient quantities.Syrian petroleum
production increased from a million tons 1 in 1968 to 5.5 million tons
in 1973, 9.1 million tons in 1977 and 9.9 million tons.
All Syrian petroleum is exported in 1977 is constituted the leading
export product. Syria has a surplus trading balance in petroleum.
Thanks to achievement in the field of irrigation, there has been an
increase in the area.
Thus, the area devoted to cereals increased from 1,744,000 hectars in
1971 to 2,602,000 hectars and that of fruit trees from 293,000 hectars
in 1970 to 276,000 in 1977.
One of the aim of the 1976-1980 five years plan to liberate an
exportable agriculture surplus of about 1,400 million Syrian pounds by
increasing production of cereals to 3.4 million tons, that of feculants
to 435,000 and that of industrial crops to 2.4 million tons. An
interesting question as we know, the 50%from the Syrian
national-economical product depends and comes fron western
Kurditan(Beshar Asad,who visted Qamishlo in 2000 ,has confirmed, that
the 50% from syrian-economical product comes from syrian
Kurdistan...ect...),(See Albaath Newspaper 2000; about Assad´s visiting
in Hassake) or at Province of Hassake agricultural Production, and
(oil-gas) and Petroleum and from all others economical Productions. As
already referred to, in spite of that ,the Government did not give the
same support and the same right to Rebuilding of industrial-economical
projects in western Kurdistan (Alhassake)in comparable to the other Arab
provinces.If we speak about the heavy industry has a monopoly of
industry and controls 80% of the industrial sector as a whole. Thus, in
the oil-refining industry, the Supreme Planning Council has just
approved the setting side of 254 million Syrian pounds for the
modernisation and extension of the Homs refinery, the present capacoty
of which is 5.5 million tons per annum.
The production work consists of building new plant for the production of
hig-octane petrol, kerosene,feul oil and diesel and for the processing
of naphtha.
A second refinery, at Banias, should be coming into service shortly.When
it attains its full capacity of 6 million tons per annum, Syrias´s total
capacity will be 11.5 million tons per annum.
Since 1973 there has been a sharp increase in the trading balance
coefficient, which had been comparatively stable until 1975-indicating
that exports had undergone a rate of growth more or less equal to that
of imports-increased to 2.22 in 1976 and to 2.5 in 1977 as against1.81
in 1975,showing that there is a tendency for the gap between imports and
exports to widen.Syrian exports increased 3.13 times between
1973-1977.This increase was chiefly caused by petroleum exports of which
increased 23.8 times by value as a result of successive increased in
quantity and uses in price.In 1977 petroleum was the chief item of
Syrian exportes at 2,543 million Syrian pounds,or 60.56% of the total.
Next time cotton which, at 836, 1million Syrian pounds, accounted for
nearly 20%of total exports in 1977.During the same period (1973to 1977),
a profound modification in the make-up previously occupied.
There was a fall off, in imports of food and alive of oils. Pride of
place is at present occupied by machinery and transport equipment (3,506
million Syrian pounds in 1977, or 33,4%of the total), fuels and
intermediate products. The vas majority of Syrian imports go to the
Military Sector and to the Syrian Presindency and Authorities and
Security,which accounted for 80% the raw materilas, 73% of the
manufactured products and 60% of the intermediate products imported in
1977.
EEC countries provided 34% of Syrian imports and absorb 42% respectively
in the case of the eastern block countries and 15 and 13 respectively in
that of the Arab countries.9% of Syrian imports come from other European
countries Syrian imports from Frnace increased from 167.4% million
Syrian pounds in 1973 to 815 million in 1977,making an increase of 387%.
Over the same period, Syrian exports to France increased from 54.5
million to 301 million Syrian pounds,making on increase of 452%.It is
not possible, if the majority of Syrian imports go to Military and
Authorities, and now how could we estimate the following statistic.
During 1977,Syria imported 72.6 million Syrian pounds worth of flour, 21
million of cheese, 17 million of fodder and 80 million SYrian pounds of
capital goods and transport equipment.In 1973-1993 permits for
industrial projects(but not in western Kurdistan), were granted to
private individuals or companiesas compared with 770 in 1972.
The value of industrial machinery and equipment imported in 179 by the
private sector amounted to 96 million Syrian pounds,as compared with 70
million in 1972, the capital invested in these projects were implemented
by the private sector, as compared with 52.9% in 1972.
As already announced that public companies prevail undertak in respect
of their size,their volume of the production, and their volume of
business.
In 1973 the public produced 3,890 tons of canned food, as compared with
814 tons produced by the private sector, 2,857 tons of vegetable oil as
against 67 tons of biscuit compared with 332 tons;4,401,000 liters of
beer compared with 394,141,000 seqaure meters of woolen carperts as
compared with only 10,000 in the private sector .Nevertheless, the
production of firms in the private sector does exceed that of those in
the public sector , where certain categories of product 894 tons of
chocolate compared with only 161 tons by the public sector; 898,000
knitted garments compared with 60,000; 418,000 gallons of paint as
compared with 327 gallons in 6,059,etc...Furthermore, companies and
individuals in the private sector have created an extensive range of new
industries,mostly in the field of light industry and the processing
industries: chocolate and biscuit factories,canning factories, the food
and beverage industries in general, refrigerated warehouses, beauty
products and umberellas, bronze article and light fittings (especially
at Allepo), furniture,stoves,hardware, atc.....(It has involved chiefly
in the Arab towns;provinces, which is not comparable or compared with
the Kurdish province Alhasake absolutely).
The land like Kurdistan of years old, with a charm all its own,a country
has succeeded it preserving its identity and authenticity in a
profoundly changing world, Kurdistan,Syria,Turkey,Iraq, Iran and the
modern world possesses all the assets a smooth and harmonies advance
along the road of freedom,democracy and progress.
The Institute of Euro-Asian IEAI (for strategic studies) in Middle East;
Kurdish Question and Berzanis
Prof.Dr.Moraru
Prof.Dr.Burian
Prof.Dr.Spataru
Prof.Dr.Ass Miro
|